Justin. J. Robinson on LinkedIn: “We put all our sh*t in mum’s name…” | Irwin v Pamplin (No 4) [2024]… (2024)

Hon. Wynne Carvill (Ret.) says that a great deal of the uncertainty regarding the future of PAGA cases since last year’s Supreme Court decision in the Viking River case has been resolved with the recent Adolph ruling. Learn more about how this impacts arbitration in PAGA cases in this Daily Journal article. https://lnkd.in/gyWKBryR#arbitration #californialaw #paga

7

In criminal law, after a relatively short period of time, nothing really surprises you. Then this case comes along, kidnapping, with a pretty unusual factual matrix https://lnkd.in/dGWZWcPu

2

Learn about the major mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution on this episode of our Weekly Munchies

10

The case discussed in the article sheds light on the limitations of indemnification clauses within ski area releases. The court ruled that the release in question was an adhesion contract, emphasizing that the language used attempted to go beyond acceptable bounds. This decision serves as a reminder that drafting releases with overly broad indemnification provisions may not hold up in court. It is crucial for ski areas to avoid being overly greedy and to ensure that their releases are fair and reasonable. This ruling highlights the importance of crafting releases in a professional manner, taking into account legal considerations and industry standards. https://lnkd.in/gXWN9BUw #Lawsuit #SkiFatality #Fatality #SkiLaw #SkiAreaLaw #RecLaw #RecreationLaw

Very practical guide on how to level the playing field in arbitrations against a well-financed adversary by my brilliant colleagues, Kostas Katsiris and Benjamin Argyle.

8

Summoners War Chronicles Tier List It is important to have a good grasp of the Summoners War Chronicles tier list if you want to do we... Read More on Lawod https://lnkd.in/dsSFkR9C

Eu law doesn’t request that procedural rights breaches can be raised ed officio as long as defense has a reasonable time to invoke same breach.A recent CJEU’s ruling states that national legislation which prohibits the trial court in a criminal case from raising of its own motion, with a view to the annulment of the procedure, a breach of the obligation imposed on the competent authorities, under Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 2012/13, to inform suspects or accused persons promptly of their right to remain silent cannot be considered to undermine Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter where those suspects or accused persons have not been deprived of a practical and effective opportunity to have access to a lawyer in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 2013/48, if necessary having obtained legal aid as provided in Directive 2016/1919, and where they, like their lawyers, if any, have had a right of access to their file and the right to invoke that breach within a reasonable period of time, in accordance with Article 8(2) of Directive 2012/13.CJEU, KB FS, 22 June 2022, Case C‑660/21 https://lnkd.in/dvtyV8JA

11

Psalm 19:7 - The Perfect Law of the Lord.

Trial & cracked-trial to be paid; It was not one continuous trialGenerally, these cases involve little legal substance, this one however is quite interesting and well-arguedhttps://lnkd.in/ex2Fa3EH